He celebrated the occasion with a party at York House on the Strand, his birthplace. Among the guests was Ben Jonson. Five days later Bacon was created Viscount St. Disaster struck soon after.
He was convicted by the High Court of Parliament for accepting bribes, sentenced to a fine and imprisonment, and banned from public office and Parliament. Here again, the degree of Bacon's guilt, which he admitted, and its moral evaluation have raised controversy. He died on April 9, , appropriately, however unfortunately, as the combined result of a scientific experiment and a political gesture.
Leaving London, he decided to try the effect of cold in inhibiting putrefaction, and he stuffed with snow a hen he purchased from a woman along the way. He caught a chill and went to the nearby house of Lord Arundel, where the servants, in deference to his importance, made available the best bed.
It, disastrously, was in a room that had not been adequately warmed or aired out, and Bacon contracted the bronchitis that brought about his death a week later. Bacon developed a dislike for Aristotelian philosophy at Trinity College, and he also opposed Platonism.
He felt that Aristotle's system was more suited to disputation than to discovery of new truth and that Plato's doctrine of innate knowledge turned the mind inward upon itself, "away from observation and away from things. This is part of what Bacon means by "active science. Science should be a practical instrument for human betterment.
He can only act and understand insofar as by working upon her he has come to perceive her order. Beyond this he has neither knowledge nor power. He applies his theory of consensual motion to physics generally e. With quaternion theory we see that, in the final analysis, Bacon was not a mechanist philosopher. Bacon distinguishes between non-spiritual matter and spiritual matter. These spirits are never at rest. This points towards his inductive procedure and his method of tables, which is a complicated mode of induction by exclusion.
It is necessary because nature hides her secrets. There are and can be only two ways of searching into and discovering truth.
The one flies from the senses and particulars to the most general axioms, and from these principles, the truth of which it takes for settled and immoveable, proceeds to judgment and to the discovery of middle axioms.
And this way is now in fashion. The other derives axioms from the senses and particulars, rising by gradual and unbroken ascent, so that it arrives at the most general axioms last of all. This is the true way, but as yet untried. Bacon IV [], Through these forms the natural philosopher understands the general causes of phenomena Kargon , His language turned from that of Greek physics to the usage of contemporary chemists.
Only method leads to the knowledge of nature: in Sylva Sylvarum , Century I. These spirits have two different desires: self-multiplication and attraction of like spirits. According to Kargon , 51 :. Bacon's later theory of matter is one of the interaction of gross, visible parts of matter and invisible material spirits, both of which are physically mixed. Spirits interact with matter by means of concoction, colliquation and other non-mechanical chemical processes, so that Bacon's scientific paradigm differs from Descartes' mechanist theory of matter in his Principia Philosophiae , which presupposes res extensa moving in space.
Bacon's theory of matter is thus closely related to his speculative philosophy:. The distinction between tangible and pneumatic matter is the hinge on which the entire speculative system turns. Rees , ; Paracelsus had already stated that knowledge inheres in the object: see Shell , Bacon's theory of matter in its final version was more corpuscular than atomist Clericuzio , Bacon's particles are semina rerum : they are endowed with powers, which make a variety of motions possible and allow the production of all possible forms.
These spirits are constitutive for Bacon's theory of matter. As material, fine substances, composed of particles, combined from air and fire, they can, as we have seen, be either inanimate or animate. Bacon thus suggests a corpuscular and chemical chain of being:.
Organs responsible for these functions, for digestion, assimilation, etc. These functions flow from the spirit's airy-flamy constitution. The spirit has the softness of air to receive impressions and the vigour of fire to propagate its actions. Bacon's speculative system is a hybrid based on different sources which provided him with seminal ideas: e. In his theory he combines astronomy, referring to Alpetragius see Dijksterhuis , —43; Rees and Upton , 26; Gaukroger, , —5; and see Grant , —66, for discussion of the cosmology of Alpetragius , and chemistry Rees a, 84—5 :.
Rees b, Bacon had no explanation for the planetary retrogressions and saw the universe as a finite and geocentric plenum, in which the earth consists of the two forms of matter tangible and pneumatic. The earth has a tangible inside and is in touch with the surrounding universe, but through an intermediate zone. This zone exists between the earth's crust and the pure pneumatic heavens; it reaches some miles into the crust and some miles into air.
Terrestrial fire is a weakened form of sidereal fire. Air and ether loose power when terrestrial and sidereal fires grow more energetic—Bacon's sulphur and mercury are not principles in the sense of Paracelsus, but simply natural substances. The Paracelsian principle of salt is excluded by Bacon and the substance, which plays a role only in the sublunary realm, is for him a compound of natural sulphur and mercury Rees and Upton , Bacon used his quaternion theory for his cosmology, which differs greatly from other contemporary systems Rees , 68 :.
Bacon, who tried to conceive of a unified physics, rejected different modes of motion in the superlunary and in the sublunary world Bacon I [], He did not believe in the existence of the crystalline spheres nor in the macrocosm-microcosm analogy.
He revised Paracelsian ideas thoroughly. He rejected the grounding of his theories in Scripture and paid no attention at all to Cabbalistic and Hermetic tendencies Rees b, 90—1.
But he extended the explanatory powers of the quaternions to earthly phenomena such as wind and tides.
System 2 depends on System 1, since explanations for terrestrial things were subordinated to explanations of the cosmological level. The table of System 2 shows Bacon's matter theory. His quaternion theory is relevant for System 1. Bacon's system is built in a clear symmetrical way: each quaternion has four segments, together eight and there are four types of intermediates.
Thus, the system distinguishes twelve segments in all. He wanted to explain all natural phenomena by means of this apparatus:. Bacon's bi-quaternion theory necessarily refers to the sublunary as well as to the superlunary world. For there is consent between sulphur, oil and greasy exhalation, flame, and perhaps the body of a star. So is there between mercury, water and watery vapors, air, and perhaps the pure and intersiderial ether.
Yet these two quaternions or great tribes of things each within its own limits differ immensely in quantity of matter and density, but agree very well in configuration. Bacon IV [], —3; see also V [], —6; for tables of the two quaternions and Bacon's theory of matter see Rees , , ; Rees , 68—9. Bacon regarded his cosmological worldview as a system of anticipations, which was open to revision in light of further scientific results based on the inductive method Rees b, It was primarily a qualitative system, standing aside from both mathematical astronomers and Paracelsian chemists.
It thus emphasized the priority which he gave to physics over mathematics in his general system of the sciences. Bacon's two quaternions and his matter theory provide a speculative framework for his thought, which was open to the future acquisition of knowledge and its technical application.
His Nova Atlantis can be understood as a text which occupies an intermediate position between his theory of induction and his speculative philosophy Klein c; Price It is important to bear in mind that Bacon's speculative system was his way out of a dilemma which had made it impossible for him to finish his Instauratio Magna. His turn towards speculation can only be interpreted as an intellectual anticipation during an intermediate phase of the history of science, when a gigantic amount of research work was still to be accomplished, so that empirical theories could neither be established nor sufficiently guaranteed.
Speculation in Bacon's sense can therefore be seen as a preliminary means of explaining the secrets of nature until methodical research has caught up with our speculations.
This great work remained a fragment, since Bacon was only able to finish parts of the planned outline. After that, Bacon printed the plan of the Instauratio , before he turned to the strategy of his research program, which is known as Novum Organum Scientiarum. Our steps must be guided by a clue, and see what way from the first perception of the sense must be laid out upon a sure plan.
Part 1 contains the general description of the sciences including their divisions as they presented themselves in Bacon's time. This part could be taken from The Advancement of Learning and from the revised and enlarged version De Dignitate et Augmentis Scientiarum Part 2 develops Bacon's new method for scientific investigation, the Novum Organum , equipping the intellect to pass beyond ancient arts and thus producing a radical revision of the methods of knowledge; but it also introduces a new epistemology and a new ontology.
Bacon calls his new art Interpretatio Naturae , which is a logic of research going beyond ordinary logic, since his science aims at three inventions: of arts not arguments , of principles not of things in accordance to principles , and of designations and directions for works not of probable reasons.
The effect Bacon looks for is to command nature in action, not to overcome an opponent in argument. The Novum Organum is the only part of the Instauratio Magna which was brought near to completion.
Part 3 was going to contain natural and experimental history or the record of the phenomena of the universe. These functional histories support human memory and provide the material for research , or the factual knowledge of nature, which must be certain and reliable. Natural history starts from and emphasizes the subtlety of nature or her structural intricacy, but not the complexity of philosophical systems, since they have been produced by the human mind.
Bacon sees this part of Instauratio Magna as a foundation for the reconstruction of the sciences in order to produce physical and metaphysical knowledge. Nature in this context is studied under experimental conditions, not only in the sense of the history of bodies, but also as a history of virtues or original passions, which refer to the desires of matter Rees a.
This knowledge was regarded by Bacon as a preparation for Part 6, the Second Philosophy or Active Science , for which he gave only the one example of Historia Ventorum ; but—following his plan to compose six prototypical natural histories—he also wrote Historia vitae et mortis and the Historia densi , which was left in manuscript. The text, which develops the idea of Part 3, is called Parasceve ad Historiam Naturalem et Experimentalem.
Filum labyrinthi is similar to, but not identical with, Cogitata et Visa. Speaking of himself in an authorial voice, Bacon reflects on the state of science and derives his construction of a research program from the gaps and deficiencies within the system of disciplines: sciences of the future should be examined and further ones should be discovered.
Emphasis must be laid on new matter not on controversies. It is necessary to repudiate superstition, zealous religion, and false authorities. Just as the Fall was not caused by knowledge of nature, but rather by moral knowledge of good and evil, so knowledge of natural philosophy is for Bacon a contribution to the magnifying of God's glory, and, in this way, his plea for the growth of scientific knowledge becomes evident.
Anticipations are ways to come to scientific inferences without recourse to the method presented in the Novum Organum. Meanwhile, he has worked on his speculative system, so that portions of his Second Philosophy are treated and finished: De Fluxu et Refluxu Maris and Thema Coeli. For this part of the Great Instauration , texts are planned that draw philosophical conclusions from collections of facts which are not yet sufficient for the use or application of Bacon's inductive method.
Part 6 was scheduled to contain Bacon's description of the new philosophy, as the last part of his Great Instauration ; but nothing came of this plan, so that there is no extant text at all from this part of the project.
Already in his early text Cogitata et Visa Bacon dealt with his scientific method, which became famous under the name of induction.
When later on he developed his method in detail, namely in his Novum Organum , he still noted that. I on the contrary reject demonstration by syllogism …. Malherbe , Induction implies ascending to axioms, as well as a descending to works, so that from axioms new particulars are gained and from these new axioms.
The inductive method starts from sensible experience and moves via natural history providing sense-data as guarantees to lower axioms or propositions, which are derived from the tables of presentation or from the abstraction of notions. Bacon does not identify experience with everyday experience, but presupposes that method corrects and extends sense-data into facts, which go together with his setting up of tables tables of presence and of absence and tables of comparison or of degrees, i.
The last type can be supplemented by tables of counter-instances, which may suggest experiments:. To move from the sensible to the real requires the correction of the senses, the tables of natural history, the abstraction of propositions and the induction of notions. In other words, the full carrying out of the inductive method is needed. The sequence of methodical steps does not, however, end here, because Bacon assumes that from lower axioms more general ones can be derived by induction.
The complete process must be understood as the joining of the parts into a systematic chain. From the more general axioms Bacon strives to reach more fundamental laws of nature knowledge of forms , which lead to practical deductions as new experiments or works IV, 24—5. For Bacon, induction can only be efficient if it is eliminative by exclusion, which goes beyond the remit of induction by simple enumeration.
The inductive method helps the human mind to find a way to ascertain truthful knowledge. The Second Part of the Novum Organum deals with Bacon's rule for interpreting nature, even if he provides no complete or universal theory. He contributes to the new philosophy by introducing his tables of discovery Inst. Magna , IV , by presenting an example of particulars Inst. Magna , II , and by observations on history Inst.
Magna , III. It is well known that he worked hard in the last five years of his life to make progress on his natural history, knowing that he could not always come up to the standards of legitimate interpretation.
Bacon's method presupposes a double starting-point: empirical and rational. True knowledge is acquired if we want to proceed from a lower certainty to a higher liberty and from a lower liberty to a higher certainty.
The rule of certainty and liberty in Bacon converges with his repudiation of the old logic of Aristotle, which determined true propositions by the criteria of generality, essentiality, and universality. For Bacon, making is knowing and knowing is making Bacon IV [], — Moreover, such theories are considered to be final, so that they are never replaced.
The conventionalist acceptance of making predictions concerning future events cannot be separated from the question of probability. Nowadays, however,.
Huggett , Conventionalist deep-level theories of the world are chosen from among alternative ways of observing phenomena. Although theories revealing the world structure are not directly provable or disprovable by means of observation or experiment, conventionalists might maintain their chosen theory even in the face of counter-evidence.
They therefore avoid changes of theory. Any move to a new theory is not taken on the basis of new evidence, but because a new theory seems to be simpler, more applicable or more beautiful.
Laws of nature are generally understood as being unrevisable O'Hear , The famous debate, sparked by Thomas Kuhn, on paradigmatic and non-paradigmatic science and theory is relevant here. He presupposes hypothetical theories, but these do not go beyond the collected data.
The amount of established facts is not identical with that of possible data Gillies , Because of the dangers of premature generalization, Bacon is careful about speculations and rigorously rejects any dogmatic defense of them and the tendency to declare them infallible. OFB XI, Bacon sees nature as an extremely subtle complexity, which affords all the energy of the natural philosopher to disclose her secrets.
For him, new axioms must be larger and wider than the material from which they are taken. In terms of his method, he rejects general ideas as simple abstractions from very few sense perceptions.
Bacon's method is therefore characterized by openness:. Nevertheless, I do not affirm that nothing can be added to what I prescribe; on the contrary, as one who observes the mind not only in its innate capacity but also insofar as it gets to grips with things, it is my conviction that the art of discovering will grow as the number of things discovered will grow. OFB, XI, He believed that theories should be advanced to explain whatever data were available in a particular domain.
These theories should preferably concern the underlying physical, causal mechanisms and ought, in any case, to go beyond the data which generated them.
They are then tested by drawing out new predictions, which, if verified in experience, may confirm the theory and may eventually render it certain, at least in the sense that it becomes very difficult to deny.
Urbach , Bacon was no seventeenth-century Popperian. Rather, on account of his theory of induction, he was:. Encyclopaedic repetition with an Aristotelian slant is being displaced by original compilation in which deference to authority plays no part whatever. Individual erudition is being dumped in favour of collective research.
Conservation of traditional knowledge is being discarded in the interest of a new, functional realization of natural history, which demands that legenda —things worth reading—be supplanted by materials which will form the basis of a thoroughgoing attempt to improve the material conditions of the human race.
Form is for Bacon a structural constituent of a natural entity or a key to its truth and operation, so that it comes near to natural law, without being reducible to causality.
This appears all the more important, since Bacon—who seeks out exclusively causes which are necessary and sufficient for their effects—rejects Aristotle's four causes his four types of explanation for a complete understanding of a phenomenon on the grounds that the distribution into material, formal, efficient, and final causes does not work well and that they fail to advance the sciences especially the final, efficient, and material causes.
Consider again the passage quoted in Section 3. He then further divided these three parts based on three aspects: divine, human and natural. This work is a treatise on medicine which looks into the causes of the degeneration of the body and old age, taking into consideration different analysis, theories and experiments, to find remedies to prolong life.
He is thus acknowledged as the inventor of the process of discovering unwritten laws from the evidences of their applications. Some jurists consider Bacon as the father of modern Jurisprudence , the science, study and theory of law. New Atlantis is an incomplete utopian novel by Francis Bacon. It was published in , a year after his death. The Royal Society, was hugely influential in the development of science in Europe and continues to play a part by, among other things, promoting science and recognising excellence in scientific fields.
Francis Bacon played a leading role in creating the English colonies in North America , especially in Virginia, the Carolinas and Newfoundland. Until he became a prominent member of the Virginian Council, all attempts to make a permanent settlement there had ended in disaster. He was a philosopher, statesman, scientist, jurist, orator and author. Bacon was the leading figure in the field of scientific methodology whose work played a key role in the transition in Europe from the Renaissance to the early modern era.
He is thus credited for no less than being a key figure in initiating a new intellectual era. The Royal Society and other scientific institutions applied his scientific approach and followed the steps of his reformed scientific method; and numerous scientists and thinkers were influenced by his works.
In , his career peaked when he was invited to join the Privy Council. Just a year later, he reached the same position of his father, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal. In , Bacon surpassed his father's achievements when he was promoted to the lofty title of Lord Chancellor, one of the highest political offices in England. In , Bacon became Viscount St. In , the same year that Bacon became Viscount St. Albans, he was accused of accepting bribes and impeached by Parliament for corruption.
Some sources claim that Bacon was set up by his enemies in Parliament and the court faction, and was used as a scapegoat to protect the Duke of Buckingham from public hostility. Bacon was tried and found guilty after he confessed. He was fined a hefty 40, pounds and sentenced to the Tower of London, but, fortunately, his sentence was reduced and his fine was lifted.
After four days of imprisonment, Bacon was released, at the cost of his reputation and his long- standing place in Parliament; the scandal put a serious strain on year-old Bacon's health. Bacon remained in St. Alban's after the collapse of his political career. Retired, he was now able to focus on one of his other passions, the philosophy of science.
From the time he had reached adulthood, Bacon was determined to alter the face of natural philosophy. He strove to create a new outline for the sciences, with a focus on empirical scientific methods—methods that depended on tangible proof—while developing the basis of applied science.
Unlike the doctrines of Aristotle and Plato, Bacon's approach placed an emphasis on experimentation and interaction, culminating in "the commerce of the mind with things. He believed that when approached this way, science could become a tool for the betterment of humankind.
Biographer Loren Eisley described Bacon's compelling desire to invent a new scientific method, stating that Bacon, "more fully than any man of his time, entertained the idea of the universe as a problem to be solved, examined, meditated upon, rather than as an eternally fixed stage upon which man walked. During his young adulthood, Bacon attempted to share his ideas with his uncle, Lord Burghley, and later with Queen Elizabeth in his Letter of Advice.
The two did not prove to be a receptive audience to Bacon's evolving philosophy of science.
0コメント